AI Manuscript Review Tool

Automated AI review of your academic manuscript, 80+ checks, instant results, and actionable feedback before you submit to a journal.

Check my manuscript, it's free

No account required · Results in <2 minutes · PDF, Word & LaTeX

What is AI manuscript review?

AI manuscript review uses machine learning and natural language processing to analyze your research paper across multiple dimensions simultaneously, structure, language quality, citation completeness, metadata, and journal compliance. Unlike human peer review, which takes weeks, AI review delivers results in minutes. CheckMyManuscript's AI review is not a replacement for peer review, it's a pre-submission quality check that helps you submit a stronger manuscript and reduces the risk of rejection on technical grounds.

What our AI review covers

80+ automated checks

Comprehensive review across structure, language, citations, metadata, and formatting.

Prioritized findings

Issues ranked by severity so you know what to fix first.

Actionable suggestions

Each finding comes with specific improvement recommendations, not just error flags.

Instant results

Full review completed in under 2 minutes, regardless of paper length.

Any file format

Accepts PDF, Word (DOCX), and LaTeX files.

Privacy-first

Your manuscript is processed securely and deleted immediately after review.

Checks relevant to this topic

Part of our 80+ automated checks

Structure analysis

Section presence, ordering, and content placement.

Language quality

Grammar, clarity, academic tone, and ESL patterns.

Citation validation

Reference completeness and citation-bibliography consistency.

Metadata checks

Author info, keywords, and abstract elements.

Format compliance

Figure references, table captions, and formatting consistency.

The practical edge your peers already use

Across disciplines and career stages, researchers reduce bottlenecks and submit with confidence: clearer drafts, easier guideline compliance, and less back and forth with co‑authors and reviewers.

I use it to review my students' papers. It instantly highlights typos, missing references, and unclear sections, helping me focus my feedback on the quality of the research instead of surface errors.

Ilyass, Professor in Mechanical Engineering, ÉTS Montréal

Ilyass

Professor in Mechanical Engineering, ÉTS Montréal

I relied on it throughout my thesis to strengthen my writing. It suggested clearer phrasing, improved flow between sections, and ensured my references were complete before the final deadline.

Manon, Master's Student in Speech Therapy

Manon

Master's Student in Speech Therapy

I write research in both Portuguese and English, and it adapts perfectly to either language. It provided precise feedback in Portuguese, helping me maintain academic tone and consistency across my drafts.

Afonso, PhD Candidate, UFPE

Afonso

PhD Candidate, UFPE

It gave excellent advice on how to rephrase and present ideas more clearly and concisely. The suggestions helped me refine my arguments and make my research more impactful.

Félix, Postdoc Researcher, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology

Félix

Postdoc Researcher, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology

A round of suggestions helped to generally refine the text of my paper and, moreover, to present some of its key points in a more focused form.

Oleg, Professor, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Oleg

Professor, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

I use it to review my students' papers. It instantly highlights typos, missing references, and unclear sections, helping me focus my feedback on the quality of the research instead of surface errors.

Ilyass, Professor in Mechanical Engineering, ÉTS Montréal

Ilyass

Professor in Mechanical Engineering, ÉTS Montréal

I relied on it throughout my thesis to strengthen my writing. It suggested clearer phrasing, improved flow between sections, and ensured my references were complete before the final deadline.

Manon, Master's Student in Speech Therapy

Manon

Master's Student in Speech Therapy

I write research in both Portuguese and English, and it adapts perfectly to either language. It provided precise feedback in Portuguese, helping me maintain academic tone and consistency across my drafts.

Afonso, PhD Candidate, UFPE

Afonso

PhD Candidate, UFPE

It gave excellent advice on how to rephrase and present ideas more clearly and concisely. The suggestions helped me refine my arguments and make my research more impactful.

Félix, Postdoc Researcher, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology

Félix

Postdoc Researcher, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology

A round of suggestions helped to generally refine the text of my paper and, moreover, to present some of its key points in a more focused form.

Oleg, Professor, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Oleg

Professor, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Frequently asked questions

For format-level checks, structure, citations, grammar, metadata, AI review is highly reliable. These are rule-based checks with clear correct/incorrect answers. CheckMyManuscript doesn't evaluate the scientific merit of your research, which requires human domain expertise.

No. AI review catches format-level and structural issues before submission. Peer review evaluates the scientific validity, methodology, and contribution of your research. Think of AI review as a pre-flight check before your paper enters the peer review process.

CheckMyManuscript focuses specifically on submission readiness, the format-level issues that cause desk rejection. We don't give vague 'improve your writing' suggestions; we give specific, actionable findings tied to journal submission standards.