How to Revise Your Manuscript Before Submission
A systematic approach to manuscript revision, whether revising before first submission or responding to reviewer feedback.
Guide
Revision is where good research becomes publishable research. Whether you're polishing a manuscript before first submission or responding to peer reviewer comments, a systematic revision approach helps you catch everything and document your changes. This guide covers both scenarios: pre-submission revision and post-review revision.
Pre-submission revision: a systematic approach
Before submitting for the first time, work through these revision passes:
Structural pass: Check all sections are present, in the right order, and contain appropriate content
Logic pass: Read for narrative flow, does each section connect to the next?
Evidence pass: Every claim is supported by citations or your own data
Language pass: Grammar, clarity, academic tone throughout
Technical pass: Citations match references, figures are numbered, metadata is complete
Final checklist: Run through your journal submission checklist
Responding to peer reviewer comments
When you receive reviewer feedback, the response process has a structure: create a response document that addresses every comment point-by-point, starting with the most substantive concerns.
Read all comments before revising, understand the overall picture first
Categorize comments: major (require substantial changes), minor (editorial fixes), requests for clarification
Prioritize major comments, these determine whether the paper is accepted
For each comment: acknowledge the point, describe your revision, show the changed text
Don't be defensive, even if you disagree, respond respectfully
If you don't make a requested change, explain why clearly
Common revision mistakes
Mistakes that lead to rejection on resubmission:
Addressing comments superficially without substantive changes
Introducing new errors while fixing others
Not running a final check after revisions
Forgetting to update the abstract to match changes in the body
Not updating the response letter when you change your revision strategy
Using AI tools in revision
AI tools like CheckMyManuscript can help at multiple revision stages. Run it after your structural pass to catch technical issues before your language pass. Run it again after incorporating reviewer comments to ensure the revised manuscript hasn't introduced new problems. Each check takes under 2 minutes.
Ready to check your manuscript?
Upload your paper and get a submission readiness report in under 2 minutes.
Check my manuscript, it's freeNo account · PDF, Word, LaTeX · Results in <2 min
Frequently asked questions
Most experienced researchers do 3–5 revision passes, each focused on a different dimension: structure, logic, evidence, language, and technical compliance. Running them in sequence is more effective than trying to fix everything in one pass.
Respond respectfully and provide clear evidence for your position. Don't dismiss the concern, address it thoroughly with citations or additional data. Editors respect authors who engage thoughtfully even in disagreement.
Yes: revisions often introduce new issues. Running CheckMyManuscript after a major revision cycle catches errors introduced during editing, updated references that have inconsistencies, or sections that lost coherence during restructuring.