Before a supervision meeting
- 1
Student emails you their draft
- 2
Upload to get instant AI feedback
- 3
Student fixes surface issues beforehand
- 4
Meeting focuses on research substance
More productive face-to-face time
Let AI catch the typos, formatting issues, and missing references so you can focus your feedback on what matters most: the quality of research and ideas.
Student supervision is demanding. Between teaching, research, and administrative duties, reviewing drafts can become a bottleneck. Our tool handles the mechanical checks so you don't have to.
Stop marking the same typos and formatting errors over and over. Let AI handle surface-level checks while you focus on substantive feedback.
Apply the same rigorous quality checks to every student paper, regardless of your workload or time constraints.
When formatting issues are already flagged, you can dedicate your expertise to evaluating methodology, arguments, and contribution to the field.
Students receive detailed, actionable feedback they can learn from, building better writing habits before they submit to you.
No new tools to learn, no complex integrations. Just upload a paper and get actionable feedback, whether you run it yourself or have your students use it before sending drafts your way.
Student emails you their draft
Upload to get instant AI feedback
Student fixes surface issues beforehand
Meeting focuses on research substance
More productive face-to-face time
Receive 50+ page chapter from PhD student
Run through automated checks first
Get structured report of all issues
Add your high-level feedback on top
Comprehensive review in half the time
Student thinks they're ready to submit
One final check catches missed issues
Fix formatting before desk rejection
Submit with confidence
Avoid embarrassing rejections
Have students run checks themselves
They receive report in their inbox
Only papers meeting baseline reach you
Your queue is already pre-filtered
Scale supervision without burnout
Every supervisor knows the feeling: red-penning the same mistakes across dozens of papers. Our AI catches these automatically, so students can fix them before they reach your desk.
Grammar and spelling errors
Subject-verb agreement issues
Non-academic tone detection
Unclear phrasing and jargon
Missing required sections
Content in wrong sections
Inconsistent heading hierarchy
Poor transitions between sections
Missing bibliography entries
Citation-reference mismatches
Duplicate references
Invalid DOIs and URLs
Missing or duplicate captions
Uncited visual elements
References out of order
Incorrect numbering
From engineering to medicine to evolutionary biology, professors and researchers across disciplines rely on our tool to streamline their review process.
“I use it to review my students' papers. It instantly highlights typos, missing references, and unclear sections, helping me focus my feedback on the quality of the research instead of surface errors.”

Ilyass
Professor in Mechanical Engineering, ÉTS Montréal
“A round of suggestions helped to generally refine the text of my paper and, moreover, to present some of its key points in a more focused form.”

Oleg
Professor, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
“It gave excellent advice on how to rephrase and present ideas more clearly and concisely. The suggestions helped me refine my arguments and make my research more impactful.”

Félix
Postdoc Researcher, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology
Everything researchers ask before their first check from upload formats to privacy policy. Still curious? Drop us a note and we'll walk you through it.
CheckMyManuscript is a free automated tool that validates your manuscript's formatting before journal submission. It runs 80+ checks against journal-specific requirements and catches the errors most likely to cause desk rejection, including incorrect reference style, wrong section structure, missing required elements, and word count violations. It covers 100+ publishers and major citation styles: APA, MLA, IEEE, and Chicago.