How to Choose the Right Journal for Your Paper
Choosing the right journal is one of the most important decisions in the publication process. A mismatch between your paper and the journal almost always results in desk rejection.
Guide
Selecting the right journal before writing your final draft saves time, reduces rejections, and ensures your research reaches the right audience. The most common reason for desk rejection is scope mismatch: the paper is scientifically sound but outside the journal's aims and scope. A systematic approach to journal selection prevents this.
Start with scope, not prestige
The first filter when selecting a journal is scope match, not impact factor. Read the journal's aims and scope statement carefully. If your paper is not a clear fit, it will be desk-rejected regardless of its quality. Many researchers submit to high-prestige journals first and work their way down; this is acceptable, but be honest about scope fit at each level.
Key factors to evaluate
Once you have confirmed scope fit, evaluate the journal on these dimensions:
Impact Factor and CiteScore: useful proxies for prestige and audience size
Open access options: fully open access (APC required), hybrid (optional), or subscription only
Review turnaround time: top journals typically take 3-6 months; faster journals exist
Acceptance rate: top journals have 5-15% acceptance; broader journals 30-50%
Audience: who reads this journal? Is it your target community?
Special issues: is there a relevant special issue coming up?
Open access considerations
Funding bodies increasingly mandate open access publication. Check whether your funder requires open access and whether they have an agreement with your target journal. Fully open access journals charge article processing charges (APCs) ranging from $500 to $5,000+. Many funders cover APCs. Preprint posting on arXiv or bioRxiv can make your work accessible before formal publication.
Using journal finder tools
Several tools can help identify journals: Elsevier Journal Finder, Springer Journal Suggester, JANE (Journal/Author Name Estimator), and Edanz Journal Selector. These use your abstract to suggest relevant journals. Once you have a shortlist, verify scope fit manually by reading recent issues.
Before you submit: check the journal's requirements
Every journal has specific formatting requirements. Before submitting, read the author guidelines and run CheckMyManuscript to verify your manuscript meets format, structure, and compliance requirements. A paper formatted for the wrong journal often has missing or wrongly formatted declarations and references.
Ready to check your manuscript?
Upload your paper and get a submission readiness report in under 2 minutes.
Check my manuscript, it's freeNo account · PDF, Word, LaTeX · Results in <2 min
Frequently asked questions
Read the journal's aims and scope statement, then look at 5-10 recent papers published in the journal. If your paper is similar in topic, method, and framing to recent publications, it is likely a scope fit. If you cannot find similar papers, reconsider.
Not necessarily. A better strategy is to identify the highest-prestige journal where your paper is a genuine scope fit. Submitting to journals where your paper is out of scope wastes time regardless of impact factor.
Subscription journals charge readers (via library subscriptions) to access articles. Open access journals make articles freely available; authors typically pay an article processing charge (APC). Many journals offer hybrid options where authors can pay for open access in an otherwise subscription journal.
Peer review timelines vary widely. Nature and Science family journals take 2-4 months on average. Specialized journals typically take 3-6 months. Some open access journals offer faster turnaround. You can check journal turnaround statistics on tools like Scimago or by asking colleagues.