MDPI Journal Submission Checker

Validate your manuscript against MDPI formatting requirements before submission.

Check my manuscript, it's free

No account required · Results in <2 minutes · PDF, Word & LaTeX

What does MDPI require for submissions?

MDPI (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute) publishes 400+ open-access journals with rapid peer review turnaround. MDPI journals use a standardized template with specific section requirements, mandatory structured abstracts with keyword lists, and strict reference formatting using numbered citation style. MDPI enforces author contribution statements, funding acknowledgment, and conflict of interest declarations on every submission. Article processing charges (APCs) apply after acceptance.

MDPI compliance checks

MDPI abstract structure check

Validate that your abstract includes the required background, methods, results, and conclusions subheadings.

Keyword count validation

Verify that the keyword list contains between 3 and 10 keywords as required by MDPI.

Numbered reference format validation

Check that references use MDPI's numbered citation style with consistent formatting throughout.

Author contributions section (CRediT)

Confirm that author contributions are declared using the CRediT taxonomy as required for all MDPI submissions.

Conflict of interest and funding statements

Verify that both a conflict of interest declaration and a funding acknowledgment are present.

Checks relevant to this topic

Part of our 80+ automated checks

Abstract structure

Structured abstract with Background, Methods, Results, and Conclusions subheadings.

Keyword count (3-10 keywords)

Keyword list contains between 3 and 10 items as required by MDPI.

Numbered references format

References use MDPI's numbered citation style in correct order.

Author contributions present

CRediT author contribution statement included for all authors.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest declaration present for all authors.

Funding acknowledgment

Funding sources acknowledged with funder names and grant numbers.

Section order

Manuscript sections follow MDPI's required order for the article type.

The practical edge your peers already use

Across disciplines and career stages, researchers reduce bottlenecks and submit with confidence: clearer drafts, easier guideline compliance, and less back and forth with co‑authors and reviewers.

I use it to review my students' papers. It instantly highlights typos, missing references, and unclear sections, helping me focus my feedback on the quality of the research instead of surface errors.

Ilyass, Professor in Mechanical Engineering, ÉTS Montréal

Ilyass

Professor in Mechanical Engineering, ÉTS Montréal

I relied on it throughout my thesis to strengthen my writing. It suggested clearer phrasing, improved flow between sections, and ensured my references were complete before the final deadline.

Manon, Master's Student in Speech Therapy

Manon

Master's Student in Speech Therapy

I write research in both Portuguese and English, and it adapts perfectly to either language. It provided precise feedback in Portuguese, helping me maintain academic tone and consistency across my drafts.

Afonso, PhD Candidate, UFPE

Afonso

PhD Candidate, UFPE

It gave excellent advice on how to rephrase and present ideas more clearly and concisely. The suggestions helped me refine my arguments and make my research more impactful.

Félix, Postdoc Researcher, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology

Félix

Postdoc Researcher, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology

A round of suggestions helped to generally refine the text of my paper and, moreover, to present some of its key points in a more focused form.

Oleg, Professor, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Oleg

Professor, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

I use it to review my students' papers. It instantly highlights typos, missing references, and unclear sections, helping me focus my feedback on the quality of the research instead of surface errors.

Ilyass, Professor in Mechanical Engineering, ÉTS Montréal

Ilyass

Professor in Mechanical Engineering, ÉTS Montréal

I relied on it throughout my thesis to strengthen my writing. It suggested clearer phrasing, improved flow between sections, and ensured my references were complete before the final deadline.

Manon, Master's Student in Speech Therapy

Manon

Master's Student in Speech Therapy

I write research in both Portuguese and English, and it adapts perfectly to either language. It provided precise feedback in Portuguese, helping me maintain academic tone and consistency across my drafts.

Afonso, PhD Candidate, UFPE

Afonso

PhD Candidate, UFPE

It gave excellent advice on how to rephrase and present ideas more clearly and concisely. The suggestions helped me refine my arguments and make my research more impactful.

Félix, Postdoc Researcher, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology

Félix

Postdoc Researcher, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology

A round of suggestions helped to generally refine the text of my paper and, moreover, to present some of its key points in a more focused form.

Oleg, Professor, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Oleg

Professor, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Frequently asked questions

MDPI requires structured abstracts (Background, Methods, Results, Conclusions), 3-10 keywords, numbered references, CRediT author contributions, conflict of interest declarations, and funding acknowledgments. Manuscripts must follow the MDPI Word or LaTeX template.

MDPI uses a numbered citation style where references are cited as superscript numbers in the text and listed numerically in the reference list. Author names use initials, and journal names are abbreviated.

MDPI journals charge article processing charges (APCs) after acceptance, as all journals are fully open access. APC amounts vary by journal. Many journals offer discounts for researchers from low-income countries.

Common MDPI desk rejection reasons include unstructured abstracts, keyword lists outside the 3-10 range, missing author contribution statements, absent conflict of interest declarations, and references not following the numbered format.