Nature Journal Manuscript Formatting Requirements
Validate your manuscript against Nature's submission requirements before you upload to the Nature portal.
Check my manuscript, it's freeNo account required · Results in <2 minutes · PDF, Word & LaTeX
Nature submission requirements
Nature is one of the world's most selective scientific journals, publishing landmark multidisciplinary research. Nature research articles open with an unreferenced summary paragraph of about 200 words written for a broad audience, keep the main text to roughly 3,000 words, and require a mandatory data availability statement, author contributions via CRediT taxonomy, competing interests declarations, and a life sciences or social sciences reporting summary where applicable. Nature also has specific requirements for Extended Data figures (maximum 10 items) and Supplementary Information formatting. Our checker validates the checkable Nature-specific requirements so your manuscript is submission-ready.
Nature requirements, and what CMM checks automatically
Each requirement below is sourced from Nature's official guidelines and flagged for whether CheckMyManuscript can verify it deterministically or whether it depends on editorial judgement.
Summary paragraph length
✓ CMM checks this~200 words, unreferenced, written for a broad audience (Nature's equivalent of an abstract).
Pass: 198-word summary. Flag: 280-word summary with inline citations.
Source: nature.com · verified May 29, 2026
Main text length
✓ CMM checks this~3,000 words, excluding summary paragraph, methods, and references.
Flag: 5,400-word main text reformatted from another journal.
Source: nature.com · verified May 29, 2026
Data availability statement
✓ CMM checks thisMandatory. Must name repositories and accession numbers (NCBI SRA/GEO or ENA for sequencing, PDB for structures, PRIDE for mass spec).
Flag: "Data available on request" with no justification.
Source: nature.com · verified May 29, 2026
Author contributions (CRediT)
✓ CMM checks thisAll authors listed against CRediT taxonomy roles; every role maps to at least one author.
Source: nature.com · verified May 29, 2026
Competing interests declaration
✓ CMM checks thisExplicit declaration for every author, or an explicit statement of none.
Source: nature.com · verified May 29, 2026
Reporting summary
Editorial, not auto-checkableRequired for life- and social-sciences studies; submitted as a supplementary questionnaire.
Editorial: CMM flags if absent, but cannot judge whether the responses are adequate.
Source: nature.com · verified May 29, 2026
Scientific significance & broad interest
Editorial, not auto-checkableFindings must matter to readers beyond the immediate subfield. This is the primary desk-rejection gate.
Editorial judgement, not something an automated checker can determine.
Source: nature.com · verified May 29, 2026
Requirements below are taken from Nature's official author guidelines. Nature accepts initial submissions in a flexible format; the length limits apply to the formatted manuscript. Verify exact figures against the live guidelines before submitting, last checked 29 May 2026.
Nature is the world's most cited scientific journal and one of the most competitive submission targets in academia. With an acceptance rate below 8% and editors who screen manuscripts before sending them to peer review, every formatting error is a reason to return your paper without review. Understanding Nature's specific requirements, and checking them before you submit, is essential for authors serious about publication in this journal.
Word Limits and Manuscript Length
Nature original research articles impose strict length constraints that catch many first-time Nature submitters off guard:
- Summary paragraph: ~200 words, unreferenced, written for a broad audience (Nature's equivalent of an abstract; no subheadings)
- Main text: ~3,000 words (introduction through discussion, excluding the summary paragraph, methods, and references)
- Methods: No specific word limit, but must be concise and can be placed online
- Extended Data: Maximum 10 items (figures or tables)
- References: No enforced limit, but typically 40–60 for Nature articles
The 3,000-word main text limit is among the strictest of any high-impact journal. Authors who reformat papers from other journals often discover their text runs 5,000–6,000 words. Significant cutting is required, not just trimming, but substantive restructuring of argument and evidence presentation. CheckMyManuscript flags manuscripts exceeding Nature's word limits before you invest time formatting figures and supplementary files.
Data and Code Availability
Nature enforces one of the most rigorous data sharing policies in academic publishing. A data availability statement is mandatory for all submissions and must specify where the data supporting the findings is accessible. Repository requirements by data type include:
- Sequencing data: NCBI SRA, NCBI GEO, or ENA, accession numbers assigned before submission
- Protein structures: PDB identifier required
- Mass spectrometry data: PRIDE archive accession
- Imaging data: BioImage Archive or similar
Statements like "data available on request" are accepted only with justification (privacy, legal restrictions). Generic statements without repository information are returned for revision. Nature also requires code availability statements for studies where custom computational tools were central to the findings.
Author Declarations
Nature requires explicit declarations from all authors covering three areas. Author Contributions must use CRediT taxonomy with all 14 defined roles, listing each author against their specific roles. Competing Interests must be declared for every author, either a specific declaration or "The authors declare no competing interests." Acknowledgements must include funder names and grant numbers in standard format.
Missing or incomplete declarations are among the most common administrative reasons for pre-review returns at Nature. The CRediT statement must list every author against at least one role, and every role listed must correspond to at least one named author.
Common Nature Desk Rejection Reasons
Based on Nature's editorial office feedback, the most frequent pre-review return triggers are: manuscript exceeds word count, data availability statement missing or incomplete, reporting summary not submitted, author contributions absent or using non-CRediT language, and competing interests not declared by all authors. CheckMyManuscript validates all five categories before you submit.
Also see: Nature Communications checker | Science journal checker | Avoid desk rejection guide
Nature-specific checks
Summary paragraph ~200 words
Nature research articles open with an unreferenced summary paragraph of about 200 words, written for a broad audience.
Main text ~3,000 words
Nature articles target a ~3,000-word main text limit excluding the summary paragraph, methods, and references.
Data availability statement
Mandatory for all Nature submissions, with specific repository and accession number requirements.
Author contributions (CRediT)
All authors must be listed against CRediT taxonomy roles.
Competing interests
All authors must declare competing interests or explicitly state none.
Reporting summary
Life sciences and social sciences studies require completion of Nature's reporting summary.
Checks relevant to this topic
Part of our 80+ automated checks
Summary paragraph ~200 words
Nature summary paragraph within the ~200-word target.
Main text ~3,000 words
Core text excluding summary paragraph, methods, references.
Data availability
Mandatory data availability statement with repository links.
Author contributions (CRediT)
CRediT taxonomy statements for all authors.
Competing interests
Competing interests declared by all authors.
The practical edge your peers already use
Across disciplines and career stages, researchers reduce bottlenecks and submit with confidence: clearer drafts, easier guideline compliance, and less back and forth with co‑authors and reviewers.
I use it to review my students' papers. It instantly highlights typos, missing references, and unclear sections, helping me focus my feedback on the quality of the research instead of surface errors.
Ilyass
Professor in Mechanical Engineering, ÉTS Montréal
I relied on it throughout my thesis to strengthen my writing. It suggested clearer phrasing, improved flow between sections, and ensured my references were complete before the final deadline.
Manon
Master's Student in Speech Therapy
I write research in both Portuguese and English, and it adapts perfectly to either language. It provided precise feedback in Portuguese, helping me maintain academic tone and consistency across my drafts.
Afonso
PhD Candidate, UFPE
It gave excellent advice on how to rephrase and present ideas more clearly and concisely. The suggestions helped me refine my arguments and make my research more impactful.
Félix
Postdoc Researcher, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology
A round of suggestions helped to generally refine the text of my paper and, moreover, to present some of its key points in a more focused form.
Oleg
Professor, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
I use it to review my students' papers. It instantly highlights typos, missing references, and unclear sections, helping me focus my feedback on the quality of the research instead of surface errors.
Ilyass
Professor in Mechanical Engineering, ÉTS Montréal
I relied on it throughout my thesis to strengthen my writing. It suggested clearer phrasing, improved flow between sections, and ensured my references were complete before the final deadline.
Manon
Master's Student in Speech Therapy
I write research in both Portuguese and English, and it adapts perfectly to either language. It provided precise feedback in Portuguese, helping me maintain academic tone and consistency across my drafts.
Afonso
PhD Candidate, UFPE
It gave excellent advice on how to rephrase and present ideas more clearly and concisely. The suggestions helped me refine my arguments and make my research more impactful.
Félix
Postdoc Researcher, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology
A round of suggestions helped to generally refine the text of my paper and, moreover, to present some of its key points in a more focused form.
Oleg
Professor, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Frequently asked questions
Nature research articles target a main text of approximately 3,000 words, not including the summary paragraph, methods, references, or acknowledgements. The opening summary paragraph (Nature's equivalent of an abstract) is unreferenced and runs about 200 words. Nature accepts initial submissions in a flexible format; these limits apply to the formatted manuscript.
All Nature papers require a data availability statement specifying where the data supporting the findings is available. Sequencing data must be deposited in public databases (NCBI SRA/GEO or ENA) with accession numbers assigned before submission. Structural data goes to PDB. 'Data available on request' is only accepted with justification tied to privacy or legal restrictions.
Nature requires authors of life sciences and social sciences studies to complete a reporting summary, a questionnaire covering experimental design, statistics, reporting guidelines, and data availability. This summary is reviewed by editors and published as a supplementary file with accepted papers.
Nature research articles do not use conventional structured abstracts with subheadings. Instead, the ~200-word summary paragraph should follow a specific narrative structure: opening sentence establishing context, problem statement, approach, key results, and broader implications. It is written for a broad, non-specialist audience and is unreferenced.
Nature allows up to 10 Extended Data items (figures or tables) published online alongside the paper. Extended Data must be cited in the main text, numbered sequentially (Extended Data Fig. 1), and each item requires a full self-contained legend. Extended Data cannot substitute for proper methods reporting.