Academic Writing Tips for Researchers
Practical tips for improving academic writing quality, from sentence-level clarity to manuscript-level structure, with examples.
Guide
Good academic writing communicates complex ideas clearly, precisely, and efficiently. It serves readers, not writers. These tips are practical, immediate improvements you can apply to your current manuscript, not abstract principles, but specific techniques that improve clarity, readability, and professionalism.
Write for your reader, not yourself
The purpose of academic writing is communication. Before writing each section, ask: What does my reader need to know here? What question are they asking? A common mistake is structuring text around the order you did the research rather than the order that makes it easiest for a reader to follow.
Use specific, quantitative language
Replace vague qualifiers with precise language:
Instead of 'many patients' → '67% of patients (n=43)'
Instead of 'a significant improvement' → 'a 23% improvement (p<0.001)'
Instead of 'recently' → 'between 2020 and 2024'
Instead of 'a large sample' → 'a sample of 1,247 participants'
Instead of 'most studies' → 'of the 14 studies reviewed'
Keep sentences focused
Academic sentences should contain one idea. Sentences over 40 words usually need to be split. If you find yourself using semicolons repeatedly to chain ideas, break the sentence. Complex ideas don't require complex sentences, they require clear thinking expressed simply.
Use paragraph structure strategically
Each paragraph should have one main point, stated in the topic sentence (first sentence). The subsequent sentences develop, support, and illustrate that point. The final sentence bridges to the next paragraph. A reader skimming your topic sentences should be able to follow your argument.
Hedge appropriately
Academic writing uses hedging language to indicate confidence levels and avoid overclaiming. Use hedges for interpretations and implications; use direct language for established facts and your own clear findings.
Strong claim: 'X causes Y' (use only if you have RCT or strong causal evidence)
Moderate hedging: 'X is associated with Y' / 'X appears to influence Y'
Strong hedging: 'X may contribute to Y' / 'our findings suggest X could affect Y'
Don't over-hedge: 'It seems as if it might potentially possibly suggest...'
Eliminate common weak phrases
Replace these phrases in your academic writing:
'It is important to note that' → just state the thing
'In order to' → 'to'
'Due to the fact that' → 'because'
'A number of' → 'several' or give the number
'In terms of' → rephrase more precisely
'It can be seen that' → just state what you see
Ready to check your manuscript?
Upload your paper and get a submission readiness report in under 2 minutes.
Check my manuscript, it's freeNo account · PDF, Word, LaTeX · Results in <2 min
Frequently asked questions
The fastest improvements come from: (1) eliminating weak filler phrases, (2) replacing vague qualifiers with precise numbers, and (3) putting the main point of each paragraph in the first sentence. These three changes alone can significantly improve clarity.
No: passive voice is appropriate in Methods sections ('samples were collected', 'analysis was performed') and useful when the actor is unknown or unimportant. The problem is using passive voice everywhere, which can make writing evasive. Use active voice when the agent matters.
Aim for sentences under 30 words. Paragraphs of 4–8 sentences (150–200 words) are readable. Both extremes, single-sentence paragraphs and 500-word paragraphs, reduce readability.